Non-strict temporal exploration
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 12156 LNCS, Page: 129-145
2020
- 8Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
A temporal graph G = ‹G,.., G› is a sequence of graphs (Formula Presented), for some given underlying graph G of order n. We consider the non-strict variant of the Temporal Exploration problem, in which we are asked to decide if G admits a sequence W of consecutively crossed edges (Formula Presented), such that W visits all vertices at least once and that each (Formula Presented) is crossed at a timestep (Formula Presented) such that t' ≥t, where t is the timestep during which the previous edge was crossed. This variant of the problem is shown to be NP-complete. We also consider the hardness of approximating the exploration time for yes-instances in which our order-n input graph satisfies certain assumptions that ensure exploration schedules always exist. The first is that each pair of vertices are contained in the same component at least once in every period of n steps, whilst the second is that the temporal diameter of our input graph is bounded by a constant c. For the latter of these two assumptions we show O(n)-inapproximability and O(n)-inapproximability in the c=2 and c ≥3 cases, respectively. For graphs with temporal diameter c=2, we also prove an O(√n log n) upper bound on worst-case time required for exploration, as well as an Ω (√n) lower bound.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089432701&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54921-3_8; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-54921-3_8; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-54921-3_8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54921-3_8; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-54921-3_8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know