Exploring Technology Acceptance and Planned Behaviour by the Adoption of Predictive HR Analytics During Recruitment
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1251 CCIS, Page: 177-190
2020
- 7Citations
- 70Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Ethical Considerations of Hiring Fairly in the Age of AI & Algorithms
Too Long; Didn't Read The article delves into the ethical complexities of AI-driven recruitment, highlighting potential biases in algorithms and the importance of maintaining human
Conference Paper Description
This research aims to investigate the technology acceptance and use behaviour of hiring mangers when it comes to the adoption of predictive human resources analytics during recruitment. Additionally, this paper discusses the identification of dishonest behaviour to increase the job offer success during algorithm-based data screening. In the age of digital transformation, researchers and practitioners explore the possibilities of predictive analytics in human resource recruitment. Predictive data modelling enables hiring managers to discover attrition, reduce cognitive bias, and identify the compatibility between job candidates and organizational environments. The unified theory of technology acceptance and usage (UTAUT) will be used to identify the intention and use behaviour of hiring managers when it comes to the application of predictive HR analytics. It will also be explored how the actual system use impacts key recruitment performance indicators. The structural relationships of the UTAUT model will be examined by an empirical questionnaire and a partial least square structural equation model (PLS-SEM). To predict the misrepresentation and dishonesty practised by job candidates during algorithm-based data screening, the theory of planned behaviour is applied in conjunction with semi-structured interviews. This research uncovers to what degree human resource managers trust, accept, and integrate predictive HR analytics in daily routine. Further, data modellers and researchers should be able to test, improve, and optimize future machine-learning algorithms based on the dishonest behavioural themes identified in this research study. Finally, this research will show how software process improvement (SPI) initiatives can be constantly improved by machine learning algorithms and user group requirements.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089717219&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_13; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_13; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_13; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_13; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_13
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know