Orthology: Promises and challenges
Evolutionary Biology-A Transdisciplinary Approach, Page: 203-228
2020
- 7Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Orthology is a cornerstone of comparative genomics and has numerous applications in current biology. In this chapter, we first introduce the concepts of orthology and paralogy. We then present the currently available orthology inference methods and the community-led efforts of standardization and benchmarking accompanying these developments. The large panel of available orthology resources is compared in terms of species coverage, access, contextual data and tools proposed to end-users to facilitate the analysis and exploitation of orthology data. We then review the importance of orthology applications, ranging from the study of protein families and information transfer to the comparison of genomes and genotype/phenotype correlations. Finally, we discuss the current challenges in the orthology field, faced with an ever-increasing number of proteomes of particularly heterogeneous quality. We highlight the urgent need of considering orthology at the protein domain and transcript levels and the conceptual and practical difficulties that this raises.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121570571&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_9; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know