A Neurophysiological Sensor Suite for Real-Time Prediction of Pilot Workload in Operational Settings
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 12425 LNCS, Page: 60-77
2020
- 3Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In recent years, research involving the use of neurophysiological sensor streams to quantitatively measure and predict the level of mental workload experienced by an individual user has gained momentum as the complexity of the tasks operators have experienced in heavily computerized contexts has continued to expand. Despite the promising results from many empirical studies reporting successful classification of workload using neurophysiological sensor data, accurate classification of workload in real-time remains a largely unsolved problem. This research aims to both introduce and examine the efficacy of a new research tool: Tools for Object Measurement and Evaluation (TOME). The TOME system is a toolset for collating and examining neurophysiological data in real time. Following a presentation of the system, and the problems the system may help to solve, a validation study using the TOME system is presented.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092926413&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_5; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_5; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know