Phycoremediation of heavy metals, factors involved and mechanisms related to functional groups in the algae cell surface - a review
Strategies and Tools for Pollutant Mitigation: Avenues to a Cleaner Environment, Page: 269-289
2021
- 6Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
The exorbitant usage of heavy metal in industries leads to accumulation in the ecosystem and causes various disorders. Many physico-chemical methods have developed for the removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters as well as the polluted environments. However, these conventional technologies are providing expensive, generate toxic secondary sludge, and not complete abatement. An alternative, the biological methods especially using algae for the treatment of metal-contaminated environments provides a cost-effective, rapid, and eco-friendly approach. Using algae (macro or micro) for removing pollutants (phycoremediation) is a versatile approach since algae can adapt easily with any environmental conditions and recognized as a sustainable technology for removing noxious heavy metals. Algal biomass contains a polyanionic cell wall that can bind heavy metals through the principle of adsorption (passive) onto the cell surface and absorption (active) into the cell with metal-binding peptides or contained in the vacuole. Moreover, various factors (pH, temperature, metal concentration, contact time, agitation speed) affect the biosorption of heavy metal. Thus, this review article deals with the abatement of heavy metals using macro and microalgae, factors involved and mechanisms, and functional groups involved in the cell surface. Besides, suggested that the industrial-scale data's are required for the real application.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150014273&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_13; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_13; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_13; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_13
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know