Mycoremediation: Fungal-based technology for biosorption of heavy metals - a review
Strategies and Tools for Pollutant Mitigation: Avenues to a Cleaner Environment, Page: 355-373
2021
- 5Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Environmental pollution due to the development of industries in recent times is a great threat to living beings. Different industries released heavy metals into the water body. These heavy metals can be toxic, carcinogenic, and cause threats to human beings and the aquatic environment. So, there is a serious challenge to remove heavy metals from wastewater. Biosorption of heavy metals using fungus or mycoremediation is a widely used technology due to low cost, high biomass, and eco-friendly nature. When compared to fungal biomass with other biosorbents, fungal biomasses are more accessible as a waste product from industry and give economic advantages. Most fungi applied to remove heavy metals are non-pathogenic and can be simply used without any safety issues. Fungal biosorption largely depends on various factors such as pH, metal ion, and biomass concentration and to a limited extent on temperature. This review article focused on collected and disseminated facts on different fungal adsorbents which are important for the removal of heavy metals and offer information about biosorption mechanisms as well as a functional group of fungus involved for the removal of different heavy metals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150011634&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_17; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_17; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_17; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_17
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know