Finding a Cure or Simply Relieving Symptoms? The Case of the Italian Supreme Court
Ius Gentium, ISSN: 2214-9902, Vol: 83, Page: 35-48
2021
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
For more than 20 years the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) has been in a state of crisis because of the high number of cases it must review and the paucity of resources, both human and material, allocated for the examination of each appeal. The national legislator has intervened several times in the last 10 years to introduce a sort of petition screening and ‘filter’ tool to basically limit the decision in a public hearing to questions of law relating to important individual values only and, at the same time, divert all other petitions to a simplified decision by way of chamber proceedings. Nonetheless, the crisis the court faces remains serious, and a more courageous reform—perhaps even one which would eliminate the right to ‘unconditional’ access to the court guaranteed by the Italian Constitution—is clearly needed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143407734&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_3; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_3; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know