Classification of Neuroblastoma Histopathological Images Using Machine Learning
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 12534 LNCS, Page: 3-14
2020
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Neuroblastoma is the most common cancer in young children accounting for over 15% of deaths in children due to cancer. Identification of the class of neuroblastoma is dependent on histopathological classification performed by pathologists which are considered the gold standard. However, due to the heterogeneous nature of neuroblast tumours, the human eye can miss critical visual features in histopathology. Hence, the use of computer-based models can assist pathologists in classification through mathematical analysis. There is no publicly available dataset containing neuroblastoma histopathological images. So, this study uses dataset gathered from The Tumour Bank at Kids Research at The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, which has been used in previous research. Previous work on this dataset has shown maximum accuracy of 84%. One main issue that previous research fails to address is the class imbalance problem that exists in the dataset as one class represents over 50% of the samples. This study explores a range of feature extraction and data undersampling and over-sampling techniques to improve classification accuracy. Using these methods, this study was able to achieve accuracy of over 90% in the dataset. Moreover, significant improvements observed in this study were in the minority classes where previous work failed to achieve high level of classification accuracy. In doing so, this study shows importance of effective management of available data for any application of machine learning.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097443010&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63836-8_1; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-63836-8_1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63836-8_1; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-63836-8_1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know