Robust and Sparse Support Vector Machines via Mixed Integer Programming
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 12566 LNCS, Page: 572-585
2020
- 1Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Conference Paper Description
In machine learning problems in general, and in classification in particular, overfitting and inaccuracies can be obtained because of the presence of spurious features and outliers. Unfortunately, this is a frequent situation when dealing with real data. To handle outliers proneness and achieve variable selection, we propose a robust method performing the outright rejection of discordant observations together with the selection of relevant variables. A natural way to define the corresponding optimization problem is to use the ℓ norm and recast it as a mixed integer optimization problem (MIO) having a unique global solution, benefiting from algorithmic advances in integer optimization combined with hardware improvements. We also present an empirical comparison between the ℓ norm approach, the 0–1 loss and the hinge loss classification problems. Results on both synthetic and real data sets showed that, the proposed approach provides high quality solutions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101378920&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64580-9_47; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-64580-9_47; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64580-9_47; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-64580-9_47
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know