Cascaded Framework with Complementary CMR Information for Myocardial Pathology Segmentation
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 12554 LNCS, Page: 159-166
2020
- 2Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Myocardial pathology segmentation in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an important step for patients suffering from myocardial infarction. In this paper, we present a cascaded framework with complementary information for infarcted and edema regions segmentation in CMR sequences. Specifically, instead of using all the three CMR sequences as joint inputs, we first use a 2D U-Net with balanced-Steady State Free Precession (bSSFP) cine sequence to segment the whole heart (left ventricle and myocardium) because bSSFP can capture cardiac motions and present clear boundaries. Then, we crop the whole heart as a region of interest (ROI). Finally, we segment the scar and edema regions in the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T2 CMR sequence ROI. We evaluate the proposed method on MICCAI 2020 MyoPS testing set and achieve Dice scores 0.6283 ± 0.2772 for scar and 0.5419 ± 0.2406 for the combination of edema and scar, which is better than the inter-observer variation of manual scar segmentation (0.5243 ± 0.1578).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098286134&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65651-5_15; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-65651-5_15; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-65651-5_15; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65651-5_15; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-65651-5_15
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know