The human factor as a central element in the design of the workplace. A systematic review
Trends in Industrial Engineering Applications to Manufacturing Process, Page: 465-506
2021
- 4Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Manufacturing workplace design enables products with varying levels of complexity to be manufactured in multiple configurations. However, despite technological advances, the central methodology used continues to be based on applying solutions through the exploration of possibilities rather than implementing rules or algorithms to solve a specific problem. The way the workplace is designed has a profound impact on the staff and the organization's goals, as satisfied workers tend to be more productive than less satisfied ones. This chapter presents a systematic review of workplace design considering health effects and regulations. It also provides guidelines that consider psychosocial risk factors during the design process and new trends in manufacturing workplace design from three perspectives: technology, human factors, and health and safety for the well-being of workers.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120063030&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_19; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_19; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_19; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_19
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know