Assurance Expectations Extending from the Check Lists to the Strategy and Internal Control Performance
Contributions to Finance and Accounting, ISSN: 2730-6046, Vol: Part F213, Page: 147-179
2021
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Book Chapter Description
Business activities that are getting more and more complicated with the influence of many factors increase the importance and quality of internal control systems. Meanwhile, internal control systems need to be developed according to current assurance expectations. Traditional checklists have significantly met the assurance that managers need in simple structures. However, historical developments have increased the assurance expectations of external stakeholders to a strategic level. This study aims to examine the multi-dimensional evolution of internal control in line with changing assurance expectations and to establish a framework for measuring internal control performance. A case study examining the performance of internal control in Turkey from the paradigm of new institutional theory was conducted. In the study, interviews were granted to ten people who are competent in internal control in sectors where coercive, mimetic, and normative mechanisms are dominant. The data were analyzed within the scope of content analysis and with QDA Miner 5 Qualitative Data Analysis Software. In conclusion, it is seen that a strong institutional area has been formed in the context of internal control in Turkey. Besides, it is found that there is uniformity in macro-level carried by coercive mechanisms, but there are areas open to improvement in internal control practices and performance measurement.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85161466993&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72628-7_7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-72628-7_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72628-7_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-72628-7_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know