Hematologic Malignancies
Geriatric Medicine: A Person Centered Evidence Based Approach, Fifth Edition, Page: 919-932
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Older adults have increased incidence and prevalence of a variety of benign and malignant hematologic disorders. They range from common anemia and age-related clonal hematopoiesis to aggressive acute myeloid leukemia and high-grade lymphoma. Management of these patients can be challenging given highly prevalent, age-related comorbidities, functional impairment, and reduced physiologic reserve. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is increasingly incorporated into the clinical management of patients with hematologic malignancies, hematopoietic cell transplantation, and cellular therapy. Several geriatric assessment domains such as functional deficit, mobility impairment, cognitive dysfunction and multi-morbidity have been shown to be prognostic of survival, treatment tolerance, toxicities, and healthcare resource utilization across many hematologic malignancies. Comprehensive geriatric assessment not only risk stratify but also help identify potentially remediable geriatric vulnerabilities and should be considered as the standard of care for older patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. In additional, treatment-related functional decline and quality of life are important considerations for older adults, and ideally are evaluated through comprehensive geriatric assessment, timely prognostic communication, and shared-decision making. While we await randomized evidence supporting a geriatric assessment-guided, risk-adapted treatment strategy for older patients with hematologic malignancies, it is perceivable that geriatric assessment-directed, targeted supportive care interventions will be crucial components in a longitudinal, integrated, collaborated model of care between hematologic oncologists and geriatricians/ geriatric oncologists to improve older patient outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85207910783&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74720-6_82; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-74720-6_82; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74720-6_82; https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-030-74720-6_82
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know