The pendulum of community supervision: The emergence of RNR, working alliance, and motivational factors as a means to improve supervision
Handbook of Issues in Criminal Justice Reform in the United States, Page: 365-397
2021
- 3Citations
- 5Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
George Mason University: Interdisciplinary Team Creating Guidelines for Probation Officers as Change Agents
(TNSJou) -- George Mason University issued the following research news: By Mary Cunningham Researchers from the Schar School of Policy and Government's Center for Advancing
Book Chapter Description
The rhetoric and philosophy of community supervision is moving toward rehabilitation, spurred in part by the emergence of evidence-based practices. However, there remains a great deal of tension between punitive and rehabilitative approaches in supervision. This chapter offers a brief history of this tension, with consideration of how macro-level sociopolitical forces affect micro-level practitioner efforts to balance their dual roles as helper and enforcer. Following this, we focus on the ways the tension appears in the present-day context by providing an empirical review of both the punitive sanctions and rehabilitative techniques routinely used in supervision. Our review of rehabilitative techniques includes the dominant risk-need-responsivity (RNR) framework and some of its embedded tools: cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), working alliance (WA), and motivational interviewing (MI). We discuss emergent strength-based approaches (SBAs) which shift the focus from an individual's potential risks to their extant strengths. Based on the evidence supporting the RNR, an integrated RNR and SBAs approach will provide a holistic approach to supervision and offer opportunities to provide effective treatment services.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120464321&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_19; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_19; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_19; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_19
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know