Self-Reflection in Coaching
International Handbook of Evidence-Based Coaching: Theory, Research and Practice, Page: 839-849
2022
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
In many coaching concepts the promotion of self-reflection is one of the central concerns and also plays a central role in various coach competence models. Therefore, self-reflection can be regarded as one of the key concepts for theory and practice of coaching. The chapter provides an overview of current psychological and neuro-scientific findings. A distinction is made between aimless rumination and result-oriented reflections. With a view to highly complex and accelerated changes in the post-traditional society and in coping with the fundamental changes in the world of work expected by the digital revolution supporting problem- and self-reflection in coaching is likely to become more important. The upcoming transformation processes will also change coaching tools and demand new skills from coaches, but open new opportunities.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85153840310&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81938-5_69; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-81938-5_69; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81938-5_69; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-81938-5_69
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know