Putting stakeholders at the centre: Multi-stakeholder approaches to social impact measurement
Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future: The Power of Aesthetics and Practical Implications, Page: 129-144
2021
- 8Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Social impact measurement has attracted academic and professional attention in the last decade, with research showing that organisations deliver a variety of impacts on society and the environment. Metrics have been developed for the measurement of the economic and financial impacts; however, financial measurements present only an incomplete picture of the organisation. Thus social (and environmental) impacts remain dominated by different methodologies and metrics. Such methodologies agree on the key role of stakeholders, with the aim to implement more complex, multi-directional/multi-stakeholder performance measurement systems. This chapter reflects on the role of stakeholders in this process, examining whether such frameworks can help to shape tailored impact measurement tools based on co-development with various stakeholders [Relevant SDGs: SDG17: Partnerships for the Goals].
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130114256&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83152-3_7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-83152-3_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83152-3_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-83152-3_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know