Distance Metric Learning with Prototype Selection for Imbalanced Classification
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 12886 LNAI, Page: 391-402
2021
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Distance metric learning is a discipline that has recently become popular, due to its ability to significantly improve similarity-based learning methods, such as the nearest neighbors classifier. Most proposals related to this topic focus on standard supervised learning and weak-supervised learning problems. In this paper, we propose a distance metric learning method to handle imbalanced classification via prototype selection. Our method, which we have called condensed neighborhood components analysis (CNCA), is an improvement of the classic neighborhood components analysis, to which foundations of the condensed nearest neighbors undersampling method are added. We show how to implement this algorithm, and provide a Python implementation. We have also evaluated its performance over imbalanced classification problems, resulting in very good performance using several imbalanced score metrics.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85115849374&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86271-8_33; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-86271-8_33; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86271-8_33; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-86271-8_33
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know