Restorying Imposter Syndrome in the Early Career Stage: Reflections, Recognitions and Resistance
The Palgrave Handbook of Imposter Syndrome in Higher Education, Page: 225-240
2022
- 10Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
This chapter explores imposter syndrome in relation to early career academic (ECA) experiences. Deploying life history methods, a group of ECAs reflect on feelings of imposterism, located as emerging from educational-occupational biographies in interaction with the structural inequities and working conditions of contemporary academia. ECAs can experience liminality, not perceiving themselves as having arrived as ‘real academics,’ exacerbated by market values which position ECAs as less valuable than those more likely to win high levels of grant income. Academic legitimacy is therefore called into question, generating responses of shame, non-belonging and fear—particularly for precariously employed colleagues. Yet being positioned on the periphery can facilitate critiques of academia’s hierarchical inequities and epistemic violence; this collaboration enabled resistance to individualised neoliberal subjectivities and exclusionary practices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85160488050&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86570-2_14; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-86570-2_14; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86570-2_14; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-86570-2_14
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know