Computational Modelling of Flexoelectricity: State-of-the-art and Challenges
Current Trends and Open Problems in Computational Mechanics, Page: 593-606
2022
- 2Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Flexoelectricity is the polarization of dielectric materials under the gradient of strain. It is electromechanical coupling effect that manifests at micro/nanoscale. Flexoelectricity shares similarity to piezoelectricity, the linear polarization due to strain, but is also essentially different due to two facts. First is the size effects which is more prominent at nanoscale for flexoelectricity and the second the symmetries dislocation is different from piezoelectricity. Besides, under the dynamic loading, flexoelectric materials generate polarization waves having the magnitude proportional to the strain gradient, a phenomenon that is not observed in piezoelectric materials. It has a significant influence on the band-gap and dispersive behavior of meta-materials. Flexoelectricity has shown huge potentials in enabling technology such as self-powered nano devices and writing. Thus in the past decade, it has been intensively studied by various methodologies, theoretically and experimentally, from micro- to macroscopic continuum scale. In this report, we review the modeling of flexoelectricity at different length scales and current challenges remain to be solved. The characterization of flexoelectric coefficients from molecular dynamic simulation to continuum model remains the gap that needs to be bridged in a multiscale framework between different length-scales in flexolectric-based device modeling.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136545170&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87312-7_57; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-87312-7_57; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87312-7_57; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-87312-7_57
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know