Federated Learning Model with Augmentation and Samples Exchange Mechanism
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 12854 LNAI, Page: 214-223
2021
- 7Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The use of intelligent solutions often comes down to the use of already trained classifiers, which is caused by one of their biggest drawbacks. It is the accuracy or effectiveness of artificial intelligence methods, which are algorithms called data-hungry. It means that it depends on the number of samples in the database, and the quality of the classifier could be better if their number is high and the samples are different. In this paper, we propose a solution based on the idea of federated learning in an application for intelligent systems. The proposed solution consists not only in the division of the database among workers but also in the quality of the samples and their possible exchange. Exchanging samples for a particular worker means labeling difficult to classify samples. These samples are used to expand the sets using the generative adversarial network. The mathematical model of a proposal is described, then the experimental results are shown and discussed with the comparison to the classic approach.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117450500&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87986-0_19; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-87986-0_19; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-87986-0_19; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87986-0_19; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-87986-0_19
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know