A Sierpiński 3D-Fractals in Construction. An Alternative to Topological Optimization?
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, ISSN: 2366-2565, Vol: 168, Page: 273-284
2022
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In modern architecture, the task of creating light-weight and durable structures that allow you to build more durable and openwork buildings, as well as save construction materials, is relevant. Within the framework of this study, this problem is solved by geometric methods, which means creating a ration-al geometry. At the same time, two modern methods were used. They are optimization of topography and 3D-fractals based construction. The comparison of the methods is carried out on the example of increasing the related to weight strength of a wall console. Topology optimization was carried out using the SIMP method, which was applied according to a multi-stage scheme. Fractal constructions were created on the basis of three-dimensional analogues of the Sierpiński triangle with a different number of iterations. Their effectiveness was compared with each other, and they also were additionally tested at different weights, which made it possible to determine the stability gain that the design acquires when it becomes more complex by one pre fractal iteration. According to the results of the computer simulation, it was possible to increase the strength of the console many times, as well as to determine some criteria for choosing a particular geometric method to solve the problem of increasing the specific strength of the structure, depending on the requirements.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126367108&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91145-4_27; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-91145-4_27; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91145-4_27; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-91145-4_27
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know