Documenting the Anisotropic Stiffness of Hard Tissues with Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, ISSN: 2214-8019, Vol: 1364, Page: 279-295
2022
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Recent advances in resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) leverage accurate measurements of the anisotropic stiffness of hard tissues at millimeter scale. RUS is the only available technique to date to assess the entire stiffness tensor of bone from a unique rectangular parallelepiped specimen. Accurately measured stiffness constants are required for bone mechanics models and may provide information on some fundamental aspects of hard tissues biology such as regulation of bone mass, remodeling and healing. In this chapter, we review the anisotropic stiffness data of human hard tissues measured with RUS, mostly during the last decade. Hard tissues covered here include human enamel and dentin, cortical bone from the femur and tibia of human adults, and child cortical bone tissue, accounting for 288 specimens in total. Data was collected in the literature and from previous works of our group. We performed a comparative study to depict the differences in the elastic properties of these hard tissues. Our objectives were to: (1) document the range of anisotropic stiffness constants in human hard tissues (orthotropic or transverse isotropic symmetry); and (2) provide empirical laws between mass density and anisotropic stiffness of cortical bone at different skeletal sites. Finally, we discuss the challenges and perspectives to use RUS for large collections of specimens.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129423996&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_13; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508880; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_13; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_13; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_13
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know