Optimizing Loss Function for Uni-modal and Multi-modal Medical Registration
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13069 LNAI, Page: 264-275
2021
- 2Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Recent learning-based methods render fast registration by leveraging deep networks to directly learn the spatial transformation fields between the source and target images. However, manually designing and tuning loss functions for multiple types of medical data need intensive labor and extensive experience, and automatic design of loss functions remains under-investigated. In this paper, we introduce a unified formulation of the loss function and raise automated techniques to search hyperparameters of losses to obtain the optimal loss function. Specifically, we take into consideration of the multifaceted properties of image pairs and propose a unified loss to constraint similarity from different aspects. Then, we propose a bilevel self-tuning training strategy, allowing the efficient search of hyperparameters of the loss function. Based on the adaptive degrees, the proposed unified loss would be applicable to the registration of arbitrary modalities and multiple tasks. Moreover, this training strategy also reduces computational and human burdens. We conduct uni-modal and multi-modal registration experiments on seven 3D MRI datasets, the networks trained with the searched loss functions deliver accuracy on par or even superior to those with the handcrafted losses. Extensive results demonstrate our advantages over state-of-the-art registration techniques in terms of accuracy with efficiency.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122563893&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93046-2_23; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-93046-2_23; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93046-2_23; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-93046-2_23
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know