Neural Maximum Independent Set
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1524 CCIS, Page: 223-237
2021
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The emergence of deep learning brought solutions to many difficult problems and has recently motivated new studies that try to solve hard combinatorial optimization problems with machine learning approaches. We propose a framework based on Expert Iteration, an imitation learning method that we apply to solve combinatorial optimization problems on graphs, in particular the Maximum Independent Set problem. Our method relies on training GNNs to recognize how to complete a solution, given a partial solution of the problem as an input. This paper emphasizes some interesting findings such as the introduction of learned nodes features helping the neural network to give relevant solutions. Moreover, we represent the space of good solutions and discuss the ability of GNN’s to solve the problem on a graph without training on it.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126230675&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_18; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_18; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_18; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_18
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know