Augmented Reality in Determining the Cognitive Load of Blind Users During Navigation Process
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, ISSN: 2367-3389, Vol: 405 LNNS, Page: 28-43
2022
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
Augmented Reality Mobile Applications were developed to help blind users navigate unfamiliar spaces and to determine their cognitive load during that task. The present study compared two navigation configurations: guided and unguided, to assess the differences in cognitive load in blind adults to perform a secondary auditory task during navigation. A 4.3% increase in cognitive load was found for participants using the unguided configuration. The evidence supports improvements in efficiency for guided configuration, with a 53.07% reduction in navigation time compared to unguided configuration (p-value = 0.028). Effectiveness also achieved 21.4% more successes with the guided configuration. Deferred memories were 38.3% higher among blind participants who used the guided configuration (p value = 0.006).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125277928&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96043-8_3; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-96043-8_3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96043-8_3; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-96043-8_3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know