Environment, society and sustainability: The transdisciplinary exigency for a desirable anthropocene
Social Morphology, Human Welfare, and Sustainability, Page: 35-64
2022
- 5Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
The chapter places the transdisciplinary exigencies for coupled socio-ecological understandings towards sustained interventions by addressing the complex interface between environment, society and sustainability. This book chapter places the Anthropocene as both the crisis and the opportune moment to forge the transformative context to advance cross-disciplinary agendas and pursuits, fleshing out why and how the coupled human-nature or socio-natural analytic is crucial in fostering co-production of knowledge through multi-stakeholder engagement. Painted with broad temporal strokes, the chapter contextualizes 'metabolic rift' separating nature with society followed by the efflorescence of interdisciplinary ecological frameworks emphasizing on socio-ecological entanglements. The chapter also uses first-hand empirical research lessons to showcase integrational-implementation possibilities across situated multi-layered understandings of specific socioecological settings, demonstrating that discussions surrounding 'sustainability' remain fallaciously redundant unless pluriversal possibilities are explored and encountered at to transcend transdisciplinarity from a tool of analysis and application to 'a way of being' (Rigolot 2020).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149639626&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96760-4_2; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-96760-4_2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96760-4_2; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-96760-4_2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know