Developing Decision Alternatives for Enhanced Health Security
International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, ISSN: 2214-7934, Vol: 328, Page: 229-275
2022
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
In health security decisions, it is not possible to identify a solution for a health security problem that is better than the solution that is provided by the best decision option among all other options under consideration. This point highlights the importance of identifying, or, indeed, designing, strong decision alternatives for enhancing health security. However, there exist several biases and organizational constraints that may prevent individuals from identifying or developing strong decision alternatives. This chapter discusses these barriers and provides several suggestions as to how we public health leaders can generate a greater number of high-value options.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131789626&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98132-7_7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-98132-7_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98132-7_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-98132-7_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know