Film Shot Type Classification Based on Camera Movement Styles
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13256 LNCS, Page: 602-615
2022
- 2Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Visual information contains the most important characteri-stics of a movie regarding the related content and filming techniques. Especially the way the camera moves to capture the scene is vital to define the director’s aesthetics. However, most of the machine learning tasks existing in the literature treat the movie as shallow content, rather than as an artistic work, and therefore focus on detecting objects and faces, recognizing activities and extracting plot-related topics. On the other hand, cinematography is closely connected to the choice of different ways to handle the camera, and thus camera movements include information that is useful in order to analyse the artistic style of a movie. In this work we present an original, publicly available (https://github.com/magcil/movie_shot_classification_dataset ) dataset for film shot type classification that is associated with the distinction across 10 types of camera movements that cover the vast majority of types of shots in real movies. In addition, two different methods are evaluated on the new dataset, one static that is based on feature statistics across frames, and one sequential that tries to predict the target class based on the input frame sequence using LSTMs. Based on the evaluation process it is inferred that the sequential method is more suited for modeling the camera movements.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129873144&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04881-4_48; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-04881-4_48; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04881-4_48; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-04881-4_48
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know