Current Standard Clinical Predictive Markers
A Comprehensive Guide to Core Needle Biopsies of the Breast, Second Edition, Page: 873-894
2022
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
In addition to establishing the diagnosis of in situ and/or invasive carcinoma, core needle biopsies of the breast are invaluable for ancillary immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization testing of predictive and prognostic markers in breast cancer, the results of which determine treatment algorithms and options. Whether in the initial diagnostic setting for tumors destined to be routinely surgically excised, or in the setting of tumors to be excised following neoadjuvant therapy or even in the setting of recurrent or metastatic disease, small, well-fixed core needle biopsies of breast are ideally suited for robust, rapid, and reproducible testing. This chapter reviews current standard predictive and prognostic markers in clinical use, with special attention to their utility, guideline recommendations, interpretation, and pitfalls in the setting of core needle biopsies. Specifically, standard estrogen and progesterone receptor testing as well as HER2 testing will be covered in detail. The potential utility of proliferation markers such as Ki67 will also be presented, with a brief examination of the role of proliferation markers in commercially available multigene prognostic assays such as Oncotype DX. Testing of metastatic breast cancer biopsies has also evolved and will be briefly reviewed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85164990236&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05532-4_22; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-05532-4_22; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05532-4_22; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-05532-4_22
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know