Collaborative Learning Using Technological Tools - A Framework for the Future
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13328 LNCS, Page: 478-496
2022
- 2Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
This paper focuses on educational technology designed for collaborative learning, or more correct these tools’ abilities for enhancing collaboration in the learning environment. The paper reports on findings from the Erasmus+ -project Learning Through Innovative Collaboration Enhanced by Educational Technology (iLikeIT2). The main aim of the project is to develop a new response technology directed towards collaboration in the learning environment, but in order to do so it is necessary to investigate previous development within the area. The paper presents data from analysis of 48 different tools, and their abilities to be applied in collaborative environments. Secondly the paper reports on 7 different pilots done with different tools, and the qualitative data collected from questionnaires and reflectional conversations with 31 students and instructors after the pilots. The paper thus investigates a wide range of different functionalities that are useful for collaboration, coordination and communication when doing case work in a learning environment. The paper presents pros and cons with different tools, trying to answer the research question: “How can educational technology best enhance collaborative work, and which functionalities need to be present in order to make the tool work positively for the collaborative work?”. Even if the paper is not able to conclude in a significant direction, 28 areas of interest for collaborative work with Educational Technology are identified. The paper points at possible improvements for both the tools themselves, but also for the methodology being applied when using the tools.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133260053&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05657-4_34; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-05657-4_34; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05657-4_34; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-05657-4_34
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know