Lessons Learned from Creating, Implementing and Evaluating Assisted E-Learning Incorporating Adaptivity, Recommendations and Learning Analytics
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13332 LNCS, Page: 257-270
2022
- 4Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Applications of adaptive e-learning, recommender systems and learning analytics are typically presented individually, however, their combination poses several challenging requirements ranging from organizational to technical issues. This article presents a technical study from a holistic application of a variety of e-learning assistance technologies, including recommender systems, chatbots, adaptivity, and learning analytics. At its core we operationalize interoperability standards such as the Experience API (xAPI) and Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI), and control the data flow via a standard-encapsulating middleware approach. We report on the challenges regarding organization, methodology, content, didactics, and technology. A systematic evaluation with the target group discusses the users’ expectations with the measured interactions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132970132&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05887-5_18; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-05887-5_18; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05887-5_18; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-05887-5_18
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know