On Exploring the Sub-domain of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Model Forensics
Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, ISSN: 1867-822X, Vol: 441 LNICST, Page: 35-51
2022
- 2Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
AI Forensics is a novel research field that aims at providing techniques, mechanisms, processes, and protocols for an AI failure investigation. In this paper, we pave the way towards further exploring a sub-domain of AI forensics, namely AI model forensics, and introduce AI model ballistics as a subfield inspired by forensic ballistics. AI model forensics studies the forensic investigation process, including where available evidence can be collected, as it applies to AI models and systems. We elaborate on the background and nature of AI model development and deployment, and highlight the fact that these models can be replaced, trojanized, gradually poisoned, or fooled by adversarial input. The relationships and the dependencies of our newly proposed sub-domain draws from past literature in software, cloud, and network forensics. Additionally, we share a use-case mini-study to explore the peculiarities of AI model forensics in an appropriate context. Blockchain is discussed as a possible solution for maintaining audit trails. Finally, the challenges of AI model forensics are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132753189&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06365-7_3; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-06365-7_3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06365-7_3; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-06365-7_3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know