Retrieval Practice as a Learning Strategy for Diverse Populations
Cognitive Sciences and Education in Non-WEIRD Populations: A Latin American Perspective, Page: 245-258
2022
- 3Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Students often adopt learning strategies that are suboptimal for memory retention, as reading multiple times the to-be-learned materials, for example. A more effective approach consists in trying to remember the materials after studying them, a strategy known as “retrieval practice.” Retrieval practice can be administered through various types of quizzes, tests, and exercises, and has shown to be beneficial for learning in laboratory contexts as well as in real classroom environments. Importantly, however, most studies demonstrating the benefits of retrieval practice involved college students from WEIRD populations. Thus, our goal here was to review studies on retrieval practice that focused on diverse populations (e.g., non-WEIRD students, elementary school children, students with special educational needs). Although the number of studies on retrieval practice involving these populations remains considerably low, their results are in general positive, and therefore favorable to the adoption of this strategy to benefit learning in these populations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159425679&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06908-6_15; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-06908-6_15; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06908-6_15; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-06908-6_15
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know