Evaluating a Visual Mobile Banking App for Users with Low Subjective Numeracy
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13342 LNCS, Page: 293-300
2022
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Conference Paper Description
Financial well-being is one of the many aspects of life affected by low numeracy. Digital banking interactions use numerically symbolic-based interactions. However, one of the critical learning difficulties often associated with low numeracy, a magnitude-processing deficit, is directly impaired by associating symbolic numbers with their equivalent magnitude. Using a user-centered design process, a visual financial management system was created. It was then tested with 40 participants of various reported subjective numeracy scores. The visual system was designed using a visual representation of money instead of a traditional application, which is purely symbolic-based. The study results indicated that the interactive visual system was the preferred design compared to the symbolic system for the lower subjective numeracy group. Furthermore, it also improved financial awareness and consideration across all ranges of numeracy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135039566&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_34; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_34; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_34; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_34
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know