Soil Quality Assessment: Integrated Study on Standard Scoring Functions and Geospatial Approach
Environmental Science and Engineering, ISSN: 1863-5539, Page: 261-281
2022
- 2Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Assessment of soil quality indices is highly influential in sustainable agriculture. A myriad of methods is currently used to select the most relevant soil quality indicators. However, information about the most accurate and precise methods for agricultural areas at the catchment scales is lacking. Therefore, the main aim of the present study was to assess ten soil quality indicators from a factor analysis (FA) to obtain the most suitable soil quality indicators in combination with an indicator selection method (standard scoring functions). The study was conducted in an irrigated agriculture area in the Mashhad Plain in Northeast Iran. Results of FA by maximum likelihood method showed that four factors were the most significant in explaining the system variance and collectively accounted for 78.9% of the total. The magnitude of the loadings, which explains a great part of the variance in each factor, was used for naming the factors. On the surface, nitrogen (0.12), electrical conductivity (0.11), exchangeable sodium percentage (0.11), and sodium adsorption rate (0.11) had the highest scores. In the subsoil, however, the scoring was sodium adsorption ratio (0.12), exchangeable sodium percentage (0.12), calcium carbonate equivalent (0.12), pH (0.11), and electrical conductivity (0.11). The lowest scores were obtained for soil nutrients Olsen-P and exchangeable K. Overall, higher soil quality was observed in the subsoil relative to the surface, which is a strong confirmation of the rapid land degradation processes developed in the area.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139400227&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09270-1_11; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-09270-1_11; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09270-1_11; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-09270-1_11
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know