Neuromonitoring in the Intensive Care Unit for Treatment and Prognostication
Koht, Sloan, Toleikis’s Monitoring the Nervous System for Anesthesiologists and Other Health Care Professionals: Third Edition, Page: 715-740
2022
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Book Chapter Description
The critically ill neurologic patient is complex and often their disease process has adverse effects not only on the nervous system but also the cardiopulmonary system. Studies have shown improved outcomes and decreased length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay for patients treated in a dedicated neurologic intensive care unit (Neuro ICU), likely secondary to specialized nursing care, neurointensivist teams, and protocolized management of complex neurologic illness. When it comes to monitoring a patient in the Neuro ICU, there is a wide variety of tools and parameters we record to help guide treatment plans and communicate prognostic information to patients and families. Some examples of neuromonitoring typically performed in a Neuro ICU include intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), transcranial Doppler (TCD), electroencephalograms (EEGs), brain tissue oxygenation, and pupillometry. The purpose of monitoring patients in the neurocritical care unit is to detect, prevent, and treat reversible causes of further brain injury. In our patient population, this information is often complicated, and misinterpretation can lead to inaccurate diagnosis and treatment. In this chapter, we discuss how the data we collect can be translated to the clinical context with some case presentations to exemplify the complexities of monitoring and managing patients with severe neurologic disease.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85160148641&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09719-5_39; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-09719-5_39; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09719-5_39; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-09719-5_39
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know