PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Calibration of Deep Medical Image Classifiers: An Empirical Comparison Using Dermatology and Histopathology Datasets

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13563 LNCS, Page: 89-99
2022
  • 2
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 0
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    2

Conference Paper Description

As deep learning classifiers become ever more widely deployed for medical image analysis tasks, issues of predictive calibration need to be addressed. Mis-calibration is the deviation between predictive probability (confidence) and classification correctness. Well-calibrated classifiers enable cost-sensitive and selective decision-making. This paper presents an empirical investigation of calibration methods on two medical image datasets (multi-class dermatology and binary histopathology image classification). We show the effect of temperature scaling with temperature optimized using various measures of calibration replacing the standard negative log-likelihood. We do so not only for networks trained using one-hot encoding and cross-entropy loss, but also using focal loss and label smoothing. We compare these with two Bayesian methods. Results suggest little or no advantage to the use of alternative calibration metrics for tuning temperature. Temperature scaling of networks trained using focal loss (with appropriate hyperparameters) provided strong results in terms of both calibration and accuracy across both datasets.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know