Applying Rough Set Theory for Digital Forensics Evidence Analysis
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13633 LNAI, Page: 71-84
2022
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
With the growth of digital crime and the pressing need for strategies to counteract these forms of criminal activities, there is an increased awareness of the importance of digital forensics. However, due to the poor quality or the availability of incomplete information, the evidence gathered from a crime scene may not always be optimal in practical situations. Digital evidence can be present in different kinds of devices and in many different forms, much of which is found in an imprecise format making it very difficult to be analyzed. We propose the use of Rough Set theory for the classification of digital evidence. Rough Set theory is a computational model which is an effective tool for analyzing uncertainty and incomplete information. In this paper, we apply a Rough Set model to two digital forensics datasets proving Rough Set to be a valid tool that can be used for digital forensics investigations. We applied two algorithms for feature selection namely, Recursive feature elimination and Fuzzy Rough feature selection. Additionally, various algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree (J48), Logistic Regression, and Rough Set theory were used for classification. Rough Set when used for both feature extraction and classification gives higher accuracy compared to other algorithms.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142760734&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21244-4_6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-21244-4_6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21244-4_6; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-21244-4_6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know