Convolutional Neural Network Approach for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13756 LNCS, Page: 540-548
2022
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Nowadays Deep Learning (DL) based automatic segmentation has outperformed traditional methods. In the present paper, we are interested in automatic MS lesion segmentation of 2D images based on DL techniques. The main challenge consists in proposing a new model that takes advantage of referenced CNN models: U-Net, ResNet, and DenseNet with a reduced number of parameters and a shorter execution time. To evaluate the proposed approach named “Concat-U-Net”, we compared its performance to those of three implemented models, namely U-Net, U-ResNet, and Dense-U-Net. Furthermore, we employed just one modality (FLAIR) from the public ISBI dataset to segment MS lesions accurately. The best Dice value obtained was 0.73, which outperformed those reported in the literature. Our approach reduced the elapsed execution time from 48 s to 7 s. By reducing the number of parameters, an 85.42% time gain was achieved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144816352&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21753-1_52; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-21753-1_52; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21753-1_52; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-21753-1_52
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know