Industrial Use or Storage of CO? A Compound Real Options Valuation for the Retrofitting of Coal-Fired Power Plants
Lecture Notes in Operations Research, ISSN: 2731-0418, Vol: Part F3789, Page: 229-235
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
We investigate sequential investment in carbon capture and storage (CCS), i.e., the case of retrofitting a coal-fired power plant, and then invest in carbon capture and utilization (CCU) for methanol production. A (nested) compound real options model based on a backward recursive dynamic programming algorithm is used for the analysis, which seems helpful for decision-makers who have to make capital-intensive irreversible investments under high uncertainty regarding electricity and CO price. The options to invest in CCS and CCU are investigated individually first, and then sequentially, leading to a hybrid CCUS plant that enables both CO storage and methanol production. The prices of electricity, carbon and methanol are considered as stochastic and correlated with each other. Managerial flexibility exists regarding a postponement of the investment decision and the real-time optimization between selling methanol to the market or storing CO for earning carbon credits after establishing the CCUS plant. We find that at CO prices of around 40 €/t, CCS investment is economically rational, whereas CCU for methanol is not. Combining CCS with CCU increases the overall investment probability and potential for larger profits. Since methanol is more valuable than CO, CCU can be expected to dominate the value of the compound option for the case of favorable market conditions (i.e., sufficiently high methanol and CO prices).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85212495606&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24907-5_28; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-24907-5_28; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24907-5_28; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-24907-5_28
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know