Understanding the Intention to Use Mental Health Chatbots Among LGBTQIA+ Individuals: Testing and Extending the UTAUT
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13815 LNCS, Page: 83-100
2023
- 8Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
This empirical study aims to test and extend the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in the context of mental health chatbot usage among LGBTQIA+ individuals. The proposed model uses UTAUT variables (performance expectancy, effort expectancy and social influence) as well as chatbot-related variables (willingness to self-disclose, perceived loss of privacy, and trust) to predict the intention to use a mental health chatbot. The online survey (N = 305) indicates that performance expectancy, social influence, and willingness to self-disclose positively predict chatbot usage intention, whereas effort expectancy negatively influences this intention. Moreover, previous experience with healthcare chatbots moderated the relationship between social influence and intention, age moderated the relationship between willingness to self-disclose and intention, and gender identity moderated the relationship between perceived loss of privacy and intention. Overall, the extended UTAUT proved to be useful in explaining technology acceptance of mental health chatbots among the LGBTQIA+ community.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148696569&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25581-6_6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-25581-6_6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25581-6_6; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-25581-6_6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know