Impact of COVID-19 on Nature-Based Tourism Electric Energy Emissions in South African National Parks
COVID-19, Tourist Destinations and Prospects for Recovery: Volume Three: A South African and Zimbabwean Perspective, Page: 69-95
2023
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
The carbon footprint assessment of the entire nature-based conservation and tourism estate in 2020 showed a variation in carbon emissions across the 19 South African National Parks (SANParks). Electricity was the primary source of carbon emissions at 55% of the organisation’s total emissions. The GHG Protocol demonstrated that seven national parks, including Kruger, Garden Route, Table Mountain, Addo Elephant, Golden Gate Highlands, Kgalagadi and Augrabies Falls, accounted for 85% of the organisational electricity emissions. This chapter shows the dichotomy between the staff and tourism electricity consumption and carbon emissions. Further, it investigated the impact of COVID-19 on the seven national parks to propose a post-COVID-19 recovery plan. The results showed an average 20% decline in total electricity emissions during COVID-19. Electricity consumption (thus emissions) fell during the stringent lockdown levels (5-3). However, a slight continued increase occurred with the relaxed lockdown levels (3-1), with some parks’ trajectory heading towards pre-COVID-19 values. The results demonstrate that tourism emissions declined significantly during COVID-19, while staff emissions only showed a significant decline in the Kruger NP. As part of the mitigation and awareness campaigns at the park level, a multi-pronged post-COVID-19 recovery response plan (including SANParks Green Energy Strategy) could help maintain the gains made on emission reduction during COVID-19.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85173409409&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28340-6_5; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-28340-6_5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28340-6_5; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-28340-6_5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know