Computer Image Recognition Technology Based on Deep Learning Algorithm
Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, ISSN: 2367-4520, Vol: 169, Page: 514-521
2023
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Conference Paper Description
In the field of computer vision, deep learning is a very important research topic. It can not only help us analyze images, but also understand images into recognizable language. This paper uses deep learning algorithms for computer image recognition. On the basis of traditional recognition, a brand-new machine vision system is proposed. This paper analyzes the prediction accuracy of several different algorithms in computer image recognition through experimental methods. And through analysis and comparison, the algorithm has been explored, and the recognition method has been further understood. Through experimental data, we found that among the deep learning algorithms, RBM-SVM has the highest prediction accuracy, which is above 93%. Moreover, the recognition of static objects is easier and more accurate than dynamic objects.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151981128&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28893-7_61; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-28893-7_61; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28893-7_61; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-28893-7_61
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know