Towards Transparent Governance by Publishing Open Statistical Data
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, ISSN: 2367-3389, Vol: 668 LNNS, Page: 355-365
2023
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
A large part of open data concerns statistics such as economic and social indicators. National statistical institutes and public authorities have recently adopted the linked data paradigm to publish their statistical data on the web. Linked Open Government Data are significantly increasing in terms of variety and becomes accessible to data consumers, which makes it challenging to enhance its quality. Although publishing open data as datasets is straightforward and requires minimal technological skills, it is not ideal for users who wish to use the data in a more dynamic format. This process involves several challenges, e.g., data extracting, data modeling, data interlinking, data publishing, design-decisions, and knowledge extraction. In this paper, we seek to fill this gap by proposing an extension of Pub-LOGD framework based on linked open data technologies. To this end, we first conducted a literature review to identify the most steps used to publish Linked Data. Next, these identified tools were combined with the results of an online pre-survey conducted by 35 participants on their preferred tools and tasks. Our goal is to enable data consumers to access a publishing solution that can engage them with governments and re-use government information to deliver public services and applications. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposal, we engage 8 users from the community to complete a post-survey based on TAM (Technology Acceptance Mode).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85161365041&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29857-8_36; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-29857-8_36; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29857-8_36; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-29857-8_36
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know