Using Genetic Programming to Learn Behavioral Models of Lithium Batteries
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13989 LNCS, Page: 461-474
2023
- 7Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Li-ion batteries play a key role in the sustainable development scenario, since they can allow a better management of renewable energy resources. The performances of Li-ion batteries are influenced by several factors. For this reason, accurate and reliable models of these batteries are needed, not only in the design phase, but also in real operating conditions. In this paper, we present a novel approach based on Genetic Programming (GP) for the voltage prediction of a Lithium Titanate Oxide battery. The proposed approach uses a multi-objective optimization strategy. The evolved models take in input the State-of-Charge (SoC) and provide as output the Charge/discharge rate (C-rate), which is used to evaluate the impact of the charge or discharge speed on the voltage. The experimental results showed that our approach is able to generate optimal candidate analytical models, where the choice of the preferred one is made by evaluating suitable metrics and imposing a sound trade-off between simplicity and accuracy. These results also proved that our GP-based behavioral modeling is more reliable and flexible than those based on a standard machine learning approach, like a neural network.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159416007&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30229-9_30; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-30229-9_30; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30229-9_30; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-30229-9_30
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know