Graph-Based Disease Prediction in Neuroimaging: Investigating the Impact of Feature Selection
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, ISSN: 2214-8019, Vol: 1424, Page: 223-230
2023
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Book Chapter Description
In biomedical machine learning, data often appear in the form of graphs. Biological systems such as protein interactions and ecological or brain networks are instances of applications that benefit from graph representations. Geometric deep learning is an arising field of techniques that has extended deep neural networks to non-Euclidean domains such as graphs. In particular, graph convolutional neural networks have achieved advanced performance in semi-supervised learning in those domains. Over the last years, these methods have gained traction in neuroscience as they could be the key to a deeper understanding in clinical diagnosis at the systems or network level (for an individual brain but also for across a cohort of subjects). As a proof-of-principle, we study and validate a previous implementation of graph-based semi-supervised classification using a ridge classifier and graph convolutional neural networks. The models are trained on population graphs that integrate imaging and phenotypic information. Our analysis employs neuroimaging data of structural and functional connectivity for prediction of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Here, we particularly study the effect of different strategies to reduce the dimensionality of the neuroimaging features on the graph nodes on the classification performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165570840&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31982-2_24; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37486497; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-31982-2_24; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31982-2_24; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-31982-2_24
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know