Conceptualizing Space Actors: State and Power in Space
Studies in Space Policy, ISSN: 1868-5315, Vol: 35, Page: 9-72
2023
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Book Chapter Description
This chapter sets forth a comprehensive, cross-disciplinary conceptual framework aimed at a dynamic comparison of space actors, taking into account their technical, industrial and political characteristics as well as the trajectories that bring them in or take them out of ‘the club’ of space powers. It contends that space power is a form of state power. It also argues that to acquire the status of space power, a state must possess a certain degree of spacepower, a multidimensional concept comprising two main attributes: capacity and autonomy. Autonomy refers to the state’s ability to formulate space-related interests of its own and devise national space strategies independent from or against the will of divergent interests both foreign and domestic. Capacity relates to the state’s ability to pursue those interests and implement its strategies in the political, diplomatic, military, economic, or social realms. The combination of these two dimensions results in a multi-fold typology of space actors, which consists of space powers, emerging space nations, and spacefaring nations. The latter group is then further divided into three distinct subgroups: skilled spacefaring nations, self-reliant spacefaring nations, and primed spacefaring nations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165984828&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32871-8_2; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-32871-8_2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32871-8_2; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-32871-8_2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know