UI Design Recommendations for Multimodal XR Interfaces Using a Collaborative System
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14027 LNCS, Page: 3-14
2023
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Over the past years, various design guidelines such as Nielsen’s heuristics have been proposed in order to guide researchers and developers in creating usable and consistent user interfaces (UIs) [12]. However, within the field of Extended Reality (XR), existing relevant design guidelines are still limited due to the newness of spatial technologies such as head-mounted displays (HMDs) now entering the consumer market. As applications continue to emerge that span multiple modalities and realities, guidance for researchers and developers in initial design stages is needed. This paper presents results of 1-on-1 interview sessions with UX experts in industry, using an existing collaborative multimodal system as a use case. After a brief introduction to the use case, researchers were asked questions regarding application-specific considerations, as well as broader scalability implications. Thematic analysis was conducted using interview audio transcripts to determine the most prominent themes. Results include a set of general recommendations that can be used to guide researchers in early design stages of creating multimodal user interfaces for XR applications, such as evaluation of form-factor capabilities and determination of the context of use.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85171477390&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35634-6_1; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-35634-6_1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35634-6_1; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-35634-6_1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know