Altruism in Design: Conveying Designers’ Thoughtfulness to Users Through Artifacts
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1832 CCIS, Page: 53-59
2023
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened awareness of the importance of altruistic behavior towards others, making it a timely topic in the field of Human–Computer Interaction (HCI). Altruism, a fundamental trait that distinguishes humans from other animals, can be incorporated into design through two approaches: designing artifacts that encourage users to act altruistically and designing artifacts from an altruistic viewpoint. While the former approach has been the focus of most studies, this paper explores the possibility of “altruistic design” and identifies three factors that hinder it: the distance between the designer and user, contextual dependence of artifact use, and transparency of well-designed artifacts. To address these factors and effectively convey the designer’s altruistic wish to the user, three perspectives are proposed. This study provides valuable insights into the altruistic relationship between designers and users and highlights the potential for incorporating altruism in HCI design, which can contribute to a society where people help each other with kindness.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85171382755&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35989-7_7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-35989-7_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35989-7_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-35989-7_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know