Mathematical Models and Neural Networks for the Description and the Correction of Typical Distortions of Historical Manuscripts
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14108 LNCS, Page: 545-557
2023
- 1Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Conference Paper Description
Historical manuscripts are very often degraded by the seeping or transparency of the ink from the page opposite side. Suppressing the interfering text can be of great aid to philologists and paleographers who aim at interpreting the primary text, and nowadays also for the automatic analysis of the text. We formerly proposed a data model, which approximately describes this damage, to generate an artificial training set able to teach a shallow neural network how to classify pixels in clean or corrupted. This NN has proved to be effective in classifying manuscripts where the degradation can be also widely variable. In this paper, we modify the architecture of the NN to better account for ink saturation in text overlay areas, by including a specific class for these pixels. From the experiments, the improvement of the classification and then the restoration is significant.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165036141&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37117-2_37; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-37117-2_37; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37117-2_37; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-37117-2_37
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know